Filter RSS

Your rating
Review this project

2022-01-31 17:00
Review by Glenina

(1 of 1 people found this review helpful)
I have little idea what this tool does exactly. I guess the bigger the number is the better the result.
Very simple and intuitive.
Would like a little information on the benchmarking data. What speed should one expect.

2021-11-02 17:43
Review by NOO

(0 of 0 people found this review helpful)
OK, I like this very much. Thank you for sharing

2020-11-03 13:16
Review by charlo_fourie

(0 of 1 people found this review helpful)
This tool is easy on your processor and RAM, and does not cause any stress, but it would be in your best interest to close all documents while CrystalDiskMark is running a test, whether its random read or write or following in logic order 4KB/512KB reads all things. This software performs it's job very well, definitly serving its purpose. No additional knowledge is required. Be sure to take a look at all the advantages in the feat

2019-02-19 19:49
Review by BJPGameVideosITA

(2 of 7 people found this review helpful)
Perfect tool to benchmark and compare different storage devices.
It's free, it's compatible with almost all the currently used versions of Windows, and it's lightweight
It's only for Windows

2018-12-19 16:12
Review by anh ly

(4 of 29 people found this review helpful)
thank admin :D

2015-01-08 03:14
Review by CaptJim

(4 of 7 people found this review helpful)
The only issue is the ability to test Mount Points. I can only connect to LUNS associated with Drive Letters. When will you support connecting to Mount Points
Good and fast way to test relative performance between different systems of disks
No support for Mount Points.

2014-06-18 17:28
Review by Louwin

(3 of 6 people found this review helpful)
Good program :) Would be better if the "Copy" included drive letter and disc name so information could be stored of all the discs by drive letter (copy and paste into a Notebook report).
Good program
Does not store results by drive letter and/or disc name

2012-03-05 04:07
Review by Anonymous

(3 of 8 people found this review helpful)
Works as advertised. Nice!